{"id":642,"date":"2007-07-19T23:32:33","date_gmt":"2007-07-20T04:32:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.glamdring.org\/wp\/archives\/2007\/07\/19\/conservatives-beware-of-fred-thompson\/"},"modified":"2007-07-19T23:35:05","modified_gmt":"2007-07-20T04:35:05","slug":"conservatives-beware-of-fred-thompson","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.glamdring.org\/wp\/2007\/07\/conservatives-beware-of-fred-thompson\/","title":{"rendered":"Conservatives, Beware of Fred Thompson"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Richard A. Viguerie has penned an article on Fred Thompson asking whether he should be the choice for conservatives in the upcoming presidential election.  After describing Thompson&#8217;s history in politics as senator and as a lobbyist, and going through issues like <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bipartisan_Campaign_Reform_Act\">McCain-Feingold Bill<\/a> and the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/1996_United_States_campaign_finance_controversy\">Asia fundraising scandal<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.conservativesbetrayed.com\/gw3\/articles-latestnews\/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&#038;CMSCategoryID=19\">his answer is a resounding no<\/a>.  Here are some excerpts from the article:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Senator Barry Goldwater became the first political spokesman for the conservative movement because, out of all the Republican politicians who claimed to be conservative in the 1950s, he and he alone was willing to confront the sitting Big Government Republican in the White House. President Eisenhower\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s policies were \u00e2\u20ac\u0153a dime store New Deal,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he said on the floor of the Senate. He spoke truth to power.<\/p>\n<p>Well, again we have a Big Government Republican in the White House, and now it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s no longer a dime store New Deal\u00e2\u20ac\u201dit\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a supersized Wal-Mart of a New Deal. <strong>The Republican welfare state is far worse than anything the Democrats achieved.<\/strong> <\/p>\n<p>And what has been Fred Thompson\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s response these past seven years as the GOP massively expanded the federal government? If he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s said anything to warn us about the direction of the Republican Party, he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s said it so quietly that nobody\u00e2\u20ac\u201dnot just us, nobody\u00e2\u20ac\u201dhas noticed. And by his silence he has become complicit. (emphasis mine)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>For six of his eight years as a Senator, Thompson ranked in the bottom half of Republican Senators in terms of his commitment to conservatism. What makes this more remarkable is that he served as a Senator from Tennessee, winning his two elections by hefty margins. He didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t have the excuse that his electorate was liberal, like the electorates of RINO Senators from Oregon, Maine, or Rhode Island. He had a safe seat with a conservative electorate. <strong>So when he voted liberal, we have to assume it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s because that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s what he believed.<\/strong> (emphasis mine)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><!--more-->I also want to post the interesting list that the author created showing Thompson&#8217;s non-conservative history:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public.<\/strong> See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 3, 1998.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership<\/strong>\u00e2\u20ac\u201da vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 11, 2000.<\/li>\n<li><strong>AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton<\/strong>, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 1, 1999.<\/li>\n<li><strong>AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153marriage penalty.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/strong> See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 10, 2001.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FOR handouts to politicians<\/strong>, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 6, 1995.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FOR handouts to politicians<\/strong>, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 13, 1996.<\/li>\n<li><strong>AGAINST restraints on federal spending<\/strong>, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 6, 1997.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FOR affirmative action in federal contracts.<\/strong> See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 9, 1995.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FOR the Legal Services Corporation<\/strong>, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as \u00e2\u20ac\u0153legal services\u00e2\u20ac\u009d to Democratic constituencies. See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FOR an increase in the minimum wage<\/strong>, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 16, 1996.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FOR President Clinton\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General.<\/strong> Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 1, 1998.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo.<\/strong> See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 8, 2000.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FOR corporate welfare<\/strong>, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 23. 1999.<\/li>\n<li><strong>AGAINST worker and shareholder rights<\/strong>, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s votes 4 and 5, 2001.<\/li>\n<li><strong>AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power<\/strong>, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 20, 1997.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups.<\/strong> See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 23, 1997.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FOR the trial lawyers lobby<\/strong>, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 18, 2002.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FOR limitations on campaign freedom of speech<\/strong>, by limiting contributions to national political parties to $2,000 and limiting the rights of individuals and groups to participate in the political process in the two months before elections. See ACU\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vote 7, 2002. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Richard A. Viguerie has penned an article on Fred Thompson asking whether he should be the choice for conservatives in the upcoming presidential election. After describing Thompson&#8217;s history in politics as senator and as a lobbyist, and going through issues like McCain-Feingold Bill and the Asia fundraising scandal, his answer is a resounding no. Here [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[16],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.glamdring.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/642"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.glamdring.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.glamdring.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glamdring.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glamdring.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=642"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.glamdring.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/642\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.glamdring.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=642"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glamdring.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=642"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glamdring.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=642"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}